How difficult is it to score a goal in the National Hockey
League (
One way to evaluate the difficulty of one league relative to another is examine the relative performance of players who have played in both leagues. Players rarely play significant time in two leagues in the same year, but they often play in one league in one year and in another the next. As long as a player’s skill level is approximately constant over this two year period, the ratio of his performance in each league can be used to estimate the relative difficulty of the two leagues.
Historically, the only statistics available are goals,
assists and games played. With so little
data, the best quantity to compare is a player’s Point-Per-Game rate (
|
|
Difficulty |
N |
|
AHL |
0.44 |
384 |
|
IHL |
0.43 |
113 |
This method tends to underestimate the difficulty of leagues
that are substantially weaker than the
We can improve this estimate by considering only even-strength goals:
|
71 players |
|
ESG/G |
|
AHL 2002-03 |
0.83 |
0.20 |
|
|
0.34 |
0.11 |
|
Ratio |
0.41 |
0.54 |
European players did not enter the
|
League |
Difficulty |
N |
|
Russian Elite League |
0.83 |
101 |
|
Swedish Elite League |
0.78 |
77 |
|
|
0.74 |
53 |
|
|
0.54 |
76 |
|
Deutsche Eishockey League |
0.52 |
74 |
|
|
0.43 |
30 |
These results are not unexpected given the performance of each country’s national team in the Canada Cup and World Cup of Hockey over the last thirty years:
|
Team |
WPCT |
|
Russia/CIS/USSR |
0.649 |
|
|
0.540 |
|
|
0.478 |
|
|
0.305 |
|
|
0.144 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.681 |
|
|
0.562 |
Given that the best team outside of North America
(Russia/USSR) has a lower winning percentage than the Canadian National Team,
it is not surprising that the Russian Elite League, where most players are
Russian, has a lower league difficulty than the
Most young players don’t jump directly from Major Junior
hockey to the
|
|
WHL |
N |
OHL |
N |
QMJHL |
N |
|
Junior to
AHL |
0.43 |
302 |
0.45 |
295 |
0.41 |
135 |
|
Junior to
|
0.30 |
143 |
0.30 |
205 |
0.28 |
62 |
|
Implied
AHL to NHL |
0.70 |
|
0.67 |
|
0.68 |
|
|
Observed AHL
to NHL |
0.65 |
154 |
|
|||
Only 18- and 19-year-old players were included in the AHL to
NHL analysis. Note that the AHL league
difficulty (~0.68) is higher for 18- and 19-year-olds than it is for players of
all ages. This is because young players tend
to improve substantially from one year to the next, while older players have
reached their peak level of ability.
Young players, as a group, will do much better in their next year in the
The difficulty of all three junior leagues is about the
same. Also, the difficulty of each
junior league with respect to the
The next largest source of
|
|
Difficulty |
N |
|
NCAA |
0.41 |
295 |
Since NCAA players lose college eligibility if they declare
for the
The World Hockey Association (WHA) was a North American
professional league that operated from 1972 to 1979. Initially it competed against the
|
Year |
72-73 |
73-74 |
74-75 |
75-76 |
76-77 |
77-78 |
78-79 |
|
WHA |
0.46 |
0.76 |
0.70 |
0.88 |
0.55 |
0.65 |
0.89 |
|
N |
39 |
20 |
21 |
16 |
10 |
14 |
59 |
In its first season, 1972-73, the WHA league difficulty was
0.46, which is barely better than the minors.
This is not surprising since 39 former
During 1973-75, the WHA stole away top
The league difficulty for the largest
|
League |
Difficulty |
N |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
WHA Final Year (1978-79) |
0.89 |
59 |
|
Russian Elite League |
0.83 |
101 |
|
Swedish Elite League |
0.78 |
77 |
|
|
0.74 |
53 |
|
|
0.54 |
76 |
|
Deutsche Eishockey League |
0.52 |
74 |
|
WHA First Year (1972-73) |
0.46 |
39 |
|
AHL |
0.44 |
384 |
|
IHL |
0.43 |
113 |
|
|
0.44 |
30 |
|
NCAA |
0.41 |
295 |
|
Canadian Major Junior |
0.29* |
410 |
* The difficulty of Canadian Major Junior is lower than predicted by this method since major junior players are 20 years old or younger and consequently experience significant skills growth from year-to-year.
Copyright © 2005 behindthenet.ca, All Rights Reserved